English Varthabharati
English Varthabharati
  • Karavali
  • Karnataka
  • India
  • Gulf
  • World
  • Comments
  • Sports
  • Social Media
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • More 
    • Editorial
    • Science
    • VB Podcast
    • Audio
    • Gadgets
    • Guide
    • Viral
    • Auto
    • Special
    • Food
images
  • Karavali
  • Karnataka
  • India
  • Gulf
  • World
  • Comments
  • Sports
  • Social Media
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Editorial
  • Science
  • VB Podcast
  • Audio
  • Gadgets
  • Guide
  • Viral
  • Auto
  • Special
  • Food
  1. Home
  2. Viral
  3. AI brings deceased Arizona man...

AI brings deceased Arizona man 'back to life' in court to deliver victim impact statement

Vartha BharatiVartha Bharati2025-05-08 11:49:00
share
AI brings deceased Arizona man back to life in court to deliver victim impact statement

ARIZONA: In a first-of-its-kind courtroom moment, artificial intelligence was used to recreate a deceased man's voice and likeness so he could address his killer at sentencing, three years after his death in a road rage shooting.

Chris Pelkey, who was 37 when he was fatally shot at a red light in Arizona, was brought "back" using AI technology developed by his family. They used voice recordings, videos, and photos to construct a digital version of Pelkey that read a statement written by his sister, Stacey Wales, during the sentencing hearing of Gabriel Horcasitas, who had already been found guilty by a jury.

The AI-generated video, showing Pelkey in a grey baseball cap, delivered a message of forgiveness: “To Gabriel Horcasitas, the man who shot me, it is a shame we encountered each other that day in those circumstances. In another life, we probably could have been friends.”

Judge Todd Lang, who presided over the case, responded emotionally to the use of the technology, stating: “I loved that AI, thank you for that. As angry as you are, as justifiably angry as the family is, I heard the forgiveness.” He sentenced Horcasitas to 10 and a half years in prison on manslaughter charges.

While some legal experts, like retired federal judge and Duke Law professor Paul Grimm, acknowledged that AI’s presence in courts is growing, particularly in non-jury phases such as sentencing, others expressed caution. Derek Leben, a business ethics professor at Carnegie Mellon University, raised concerns about fidelity to a victim's true intentions when AI is used to reconstruct posthumous speech.

Stacey Wales defended the family’s use of the technology as a respectful and ethical way to give her brother the “final word.” She further added, “We approached this with ethics and morals because this is a powerful tool. Just like a hammer can be used to break a window or build a house, that’s how we used this technology.”

share
Vartha Bharati
Vartha Bharati
Next Story
X